<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for www.jeffthefish.com</title>
	<link>http://jeffthefish.com</link>
	<description>The Official Website of Baby Rats</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Dana</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3450</link>
		<author>Dana</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3450</guid>
					<description>The email supposedly from B. Howse reads very poorly as if someone of low to medium intelligence wrote it.  Whatever B. Howse is or represents, he is not uneducated and speaks very well.  I have to wonder at the validity of the emails you posted.
Your blog gets increasingly ugly and loses credibility because of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The email supposedly from B. Howse reads very poorly as if someone of low to medium intelligence wrote it.  Whatever B. Howse is or represents, he is not uneducated and speaks very well.  I have to wonder at the validity of the emails you posted.<br />
Your blog gets increasingly ugly and loses credibility because of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Jason</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3449</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3449</guid>
					<description>They lied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Dana</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3448</link>
		<author>Dana</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3448</guid>
					<description>I emailed Worldview to ask if these emails from B. Howse were legitimate and they said they had been doctored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed Worldview to ask if these emails from B. Howse were legitimate and they said they had been doctored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Bob</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3441</link>
		<author>Bob</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3441</guid>
					<description>I came to your site trying to understand what people had to say about Brannon.  My amusement at the discussion has been unparalleled in recent days.  The philosophical arguments that take place in the name of science should be pushed back into the philosophical arena.  God (supposing his existence) gives each one the freedom to choose their own destiny.  To me that is love.  And surely even you, Jason, must admit that you have had that choice inspite of the haranging you have taken from others. This has nothing to do with evolution or creation.

The philosophical approach to the discussion brings us to the question of ethics.  It would seem that the evolutionist reduces him(her) self to a position of individualistic ethics.  That is, whatever he chooses as his standard works for him/her.  An atheist friend of mine remembers how he lived before in the reality of how he still thinks.  Women and sex are the  subjects that come up in every discussion.  I have watched as he plies strangers and friends alike with questions about their sex life.  However, his actions changed when after he had a sexual relationship with a former high school sweet heart who was married, her husband committed suicide.  This really was not a question of fossils but of philosophy.

Each one has the right to choose their own philosophy.  Quit blaming others for what you believe and live by your faith.  It is only by living it to the end that one can find out if it is right.  But we can gain valuable insights by looking into the lives of those who claim to live a certain life style and comparing them with those who actually do.

I agree with you Jason, that Brannon has demonstrated he does not live by what he claims.  When he said," if you really wanted to be educated…but I don’t think you are interested in being educated", he made a judgment about you that puts him on dangerous ground according to his own beliefs and  Jesus' words in Matt.5:22, even though he did not use the exact words of the passage.

Don't judge Jesus, however, by Brannon Howse or anyone else.  Feel free to judge him by himself.  I am sure that you would want the same courtesy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came to your site trying to understand what people had to say about Brannon.  My amusement at the discussion has been unparalleled in recent days.  The philosophical arguments that take place in the name of science should be pushed back into the philosophical arena.  God (supposing his existence) gives each one the freedom to choose their own destiny.  To me that is love.  And surely even you, Jason, must admit that you have had that choice inspite of the haranging you have taken from others. This has nothing to do with evolution or creation.</p>
<p>The philosophical approach to the discussion brings us to the question of ethics.  It would seem that the evolutionist reduces him(her) self to a position of individualistic ethics.  That is, whatever he chooses as his standard works for him/her.  An atheist friend of mine remembers how he lived before in the reality of how he still thinks.  Women and sex are the  subjects that come up in every discussion.  I have watched as he plies strangers and friends alike with questions about their sex life.  However, his actions changed when after he had a sexual relationship with a former high school sweet heart who was married, her husband committed suicide.  This really was not a question of fossils but of philosophy.</p>
<p>Each one has the right to choose their own philosophy.  Quit blaming others for what you believe and live by your faith.  It is only by living it to the end that one can find out if it is right.  But we can gain valuable insights by looking into the lives of those who claim to live a certain life style and comparing them with those who actually do.</p>
<p>I agree with you Jason, that Brannon has demonstrated he does not live by what he claims.  When he said,&#8221; if you really wanted to be educated…but I don’t think you are interested in being educated&#8221;, he made a judgment about you that puts him on dangerous ground according to his own beliefs and  Jesus&#8217; words in Matt.5:22, even though he did not use the exact words of the passage.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t judge Jesus, however, by Brannon Howse or anyone else.  Feel free to judge him by himself.  I am sure that you would want the same courtesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Don Colbert: High Tech Douche Machine by INTELLIGENT PERSON</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3438</link>
		<author>INTELLIGENT PERSON</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3438</guid>
					<description>jason i eat farts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jason i eat farts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Don Colbert: High Tech Douche Machine by STUPID JACKASS</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3437</link>
		<author>STUPID JACKASS</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3437</guid>
					<description>jason i am frankly surprised at how often your wit and charm is used to mask your underlying intellect.  i am very disappoint in people liek you who carefully research and conduct factual investigation for finding a truth.

furthermore i think it is very sad how you give a fair chance to both sides of argument, and ultimately pick a best side based on reason. 

oh wait, those are good things, and you are a hero</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jason i am frankly surprised at how often your wit and charm is used to mask your underlying intellect.  i am very disappoint in people liek you who carefully research and conduct factual investigation for finding a truth.</p>
<p>furthermore i think it is very sad how you give a fair chance to both sides of argument, and ultimately pick a best side based on reason. </p>
<p>oh wait, those are good things, and you are a hero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Don Colbert: High Tech Douche Machine by Jason</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3436</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3436</guid>
					<description>Oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Don Colbert: High Tech Douche Machine by INTELLIGENT PERSON</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3434</link>
		<author>INTELLIGENT PERSON</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/12/02/dr-don-colbert-high-tech-douche-machine/#comment-3434</guid>
					<description>jason i dont need to insult people like you do with your stupid remarks about a Doctor  who you dont even know. And if you unintelligent people would actually say something useful instead of insults  maybe you would not have to spend all of your time insulting a Doctor with all of your childish liberal remarks... SO GET A REAL LIFE.... IDIOTS... Oh by the way jason if you dont have the guts to tell him in person keep your opinion to yourself. You only show your ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jason i dont need to insult people like you do with your stupid remarks about a Doctor  who you dont even know. And if you unintelligent people would actually say something useful instead of insults  maybe you would not have to spend all of your time insulting a Doctor with all of your childish liberal remarks&#8230; SO GET A REAL LIFE&#8230;. IDIOTS&#8230; Oh by the way jason if you dont have the guts to tell him in person keep your opinion to yourself. You only show your ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Jason</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3430</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3430</guid>
					<description>"Stray Cumfit" and "Jerk Camearunnin".  Congratulations, you just ruined Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Stray Cumfit&#8221; and &#8220;Jerk Camearunnin&#8221;.  Congratulations, you just ruined Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brannon Howse:  Christianest Jerk Ever? by Ian Williams</title>
		<link>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3424</link>
		<author>Ian Williams</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jeffthefish.com/2008/04/16/brannon-howse-christianest-jerk-ever/#comment-3424</guid>
					<description>Gee guys - i just looked up this Howse fella - is he for real?  I do like the fact that he advocates naming false prophets - so i will - Brannon Howse - you are most definitely a false prophet.  And Ray, you should have stuck with your dad's dummy (he was a ventriloquist) - it is more believable than Kirk Cameron - God bless him!

Ray is a Christchurch boy...I knew him for a while in the Jesus Freak days.  He had NO POWER but plenty of persuasion.  He used to harangue an open air preacher I knew before he was saved (who was also way off base), and who cursed him to be an evangelist for the remainder of his life instead of a jumped up LITTLE smartass - it worked - kind of.  

When the Pharisees sought to trap Jesus at His own Word, they asked Him - which is the GREATEST commandment.  He answered "Love the lord you God with all your being, and the second, which is just like it, love your (nearest) neighbour as your self."  The Pharisees commended Him - but was Jesus rewriting the commandments or were they spiritually illiterate?

The second commandment is not to serve or create idols (like ventriloquist's dummies).  A ventriloquist puts his hand up the dummies ass and manipulates it to make it appear to talk - "Now Dummy, have you obeyed ALL God's commandments?"

Jesus gave His disciples, and all who would be justifed by faith (and not by works) ONE HOLY COMMANDMENT - that we should love one another, even as He FIRST - ORIGINALLY - FROM THE BEGINNING - A LAMB SLAIN FROM BEFORE THE WORLDS.

The Law is for transgressions until the PROMISE has come, and since He has come, there is no more need of the Law.  READ THE BOOK!  Most don't even know it - they just think that they do.  0(:-})

By the way, the second commandment is the other side of the first, and your nearest relative or neighbour is Christ in you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee guys - i just looked up this Howse fella - is he for real?  I do like the fact that he advocates naming false prophets - so i will - Brannon Howse - you are most definitely a false prophet.  And Ray, you should have stuck with your dad&#8217;s dummy (he was a ventriloquist) - it is more believable than Kirk Cameron - God bless him!</p>
<p>Ray is a Christchurch boy&#8230;I knew him for a while in the Jesus Freak days.  He had NO POWER but plenty of persuasion.  He used to harangue an open air preacher I knew before he was saved (who was also way off base), and who cursed him to be an evangelist for the remainder of his life instead of a jumped up LITTLE smartass - it worked - kind of.  </p>
<p>When the Pharisees sought to trap Jesus at His own Word, they asked Him - which is the GREATEST commandment.  He answered &#8220;Love the lord you God with all your being, and the second, which is just like it, love your (nearest) neighbour as your self.&#8221;  The Pharisees commended Him - but was Jesus rewriting the commandments or were they spiritually illiterate?</p>
<p>The second commandment is not to serve or create idols (like ventriloquist&#8217;s dummies).  A ventriloquist puts his hand up the dummies ass and manipulates it to make it appear to talk - &#8220;Now Dummy, have you obeyed ALL God&#8217;s commandments?&#8221;</p>
<p>Jesus gave His disciples, and all who would be justifed by faith (and not by works) ONE HOLY COMMANDMENT - that we should love one another, even as He FIRST - ORIGINALLY - FROM THE BEGINNING - A LAMB SLAIN FROM BEFORE THE WORLDS.</p>
<p>The Law is for transgressions until the PROMISE has come, and since He has come, there is no more need of the Law.  READ THE BOOK!  Most don&#8217;t even know it - they just think that they do.  0(:-})</p>
<p>By the way, the second commandment is the other side of the first, and your nearest relative or neighbour is Christ in you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

