One of Ken Ham’s favorite tactics is to in one breath deny some claim and use that denial to prove the claim. I know, it doesn’t make sense. For instance, he might say something like, “Of course we don’t belive that Darwinism caused the Holocaust. That is absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who thinks we believe that is simply mistaken, or deliberately misrepresenting our position. What we really believe is that Darwinism caused the Holocuast.”
Yesterday Ken Ham posted a classic example of this kind of stupidity on his blog: in response to Telegraph article about the relatedness of all living human beings. Ken quotes this part of the article:
To get to the universal ancestors (when everyone was the forefather of everybody alive today, or of nobody) we need go back only 5,000 years. Had you entered any village on Earth, the first person you met would, if he or she had heirs, trace their descent straight to you and your partner.
I’m not exactly sure how accurate that can be, since the Australian Aborigines were genetically isolated from everyone else for at least 40,000 years. Perhaps the research doesn’t include the Aborigines, because clearly any common ancestor to all living humans would have had to have lived before the Aborigines were isolated on the continent of Australia.
But that aside, Ken Ham is thrilled about this news! Here’s what he has to say:
This research certainly doesn’t prove the Bible’s history is true—but it certainly fits with biblical history, thus confirming once again the trustworthy historicity of God’s Word.
Wait, what!??? This research doesn’t prove the Bible’s history, but it definitely proves the Bible’s history! A reasonable person would have said something like, “This research doesn’t prove that the Bible’s history is true, but it does seem to fit with biblical history.” That’s really all you can say about it, if you can even say that much. In no way does this research confirm “the trustworthy historicity of God’s word”, as even Ken Ham agrees!
Ugh, what a dishonest man.