The Two People That Read My Site
Yesterday Brannon Howse told me that if I started a website, only two people would read it. And here they are! Both people that read my website!
Now Brannon, if you really think there is even one person who reads your website then you should go find them and put them on E-bay because the leading evolutionists have admitted you do not have even one.
Stumble it!
April 17th, 2008 at 9:28 am
I thought I was reading this website, but I am not either of those people. What have I actually been reading here?
April 17th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Jason, I appreciate you, even if Brannon Howse does not.
April 17th, 2008 at 10:11 am
I don’t read your website. NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 17th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Nagagalak akong makilala ka!
April 17th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Brannon Howse sounds like the name of a frat building.
April 17th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
I am the one on the left. I am also the one on the right. I am also myself. I’m the holy trinity of your readers. All two of them.
April 18th, 2008 at 6:23 am
Taisha, you are coming to Seattle!
July 26th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Jason: I actually found your website while looking for Brannon Howse’s. Having read the “Christianis Jerk” discussion and looking up your “examples” I have to admit that your arguments could not get much weaker. Can you identify something that follows a little more distict line that isn’t a little more recent than 50-200 Ma. Where are the Homo Sapiens’ predessors between 50 K. and 5 Ma? I would expect them to be all over the place, but I’ve never been shown one.
I am very interested in dinosaurs, but it seems to me that an appologist who has to resort to name calling demonstrates a week argument.
Grady
July 26th, 2010 at 2:20 pm
My argument is weak because I called Brannon a jerk, but his argument is fine even though he acted like a jerk? That doesn’t seem fair. Also, my arguments stand or fall on their own, regardless of whether or not I also call someone a name. That is almost always just an excuse to dismiss someone’s argument. Lastly, you have simply asserted that my arguments are weak without pointing out any weaknesses in my arguments. Please point out the actual weaknesses in my arguments.
Please keep in mind that this discussion happened over two years ago, and I have no interest in rereading it all just for you. I have almost no memory of it. So I will just respond to your question.
The predecessors of H. sapiens between 5 million years ago and 50,000 years ago are all over the place (at least in Africa, anyway) and they are well documented. They are all, iirc, represented by various species in the genera Australopithecus and Homo. The earliest species of Homo lived about 2.4 million years ago. The book From Lucy To Language documents them quite thoroughly.
“Can you identify something that follows a little more distict line that isn’t a little more recent than 50-200 Ma.”
I cannot parse this sentence.